Cases 41 - 50 of 608
Garcia v. Montford Unit et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Oscar Norman Garcia
Defendant:
Montford Unit, David Reed, J Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cantrell v. Belokin et al
as 4:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Julia Jane Cantrell
Defendant:
Martin Belokin, Martin Paul, Inc. and Norman Belokin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Landry v. Skinner
as 4:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
Norman J. Landry
Respondent:
James Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman et al v. Community Loan Servicing, LLC
as 3:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Norman and Carol Lynn Norman
Defendant:
Community Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Landry v. Skinner
as 4:2022cv00302
Petitioner:
Norman Joseph Landry
Respondent:
James Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Landry v. Collin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Norman Joseph Landry
Defendant:
Collin County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Kevin Green and US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landry v. Smith, et al
as 4:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Norman J Landry
Defendant:
Judge Benjamin Smith, Collin County District Court, Collin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smithback v. State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00680
Petitioner:
Robert Norman Smithback
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Jack Norman Vaughn, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
