Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CMFG Life Insurance Company et al v. Banc of America Securities, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
CMFG Life Insurance Company , MEMBERS Life Insurance Company and CUMIS Insurance Society
Defendant:
Banc of America Securities, LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
McLaurin et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 2:2012cv01234
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
Nolan McLaurin and Louis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dahlk v. Woomer et al
as 2:2012cv00556
Defendant:
Michell Woomer, Timothy Pierce , Stephanie Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
John G Dahlk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dietrich, Jacob v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
Jacob T. Dietrich
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Kathryn R. Anderson , Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce, Joseph v. Pittman, Darlene
as 3:2011cv00752
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
Darlene Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Dwight v. Raemisch, Richard et al
as 3:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Williams
Defendant:
Richard A. Raemisch , David J. Mahony , Correct Care Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00781
Petitioner:
Antwon Pierce
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
