Cases 41 - 50 of 636
Seay v. Traveloko Inc et al
as 3:2022cv02452
Plaintiff:
Sandford Seay
Defendant:
Traveloko, Inc. d/b/a Traveloko, Arnold Lamotte and Traveloko Inc doing business as Traveloko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Callier v. JUMPSTART FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
JUMPSTART FINANCIAL, LLC, JACK SEIGLER, ARNOLD & SMITH LAW, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Arnold-Anderson v. Direct Chassislink, Inc
as 4:2022cv03286
Plaintiff:
Mattie Arnold-Anderson
Defendant:
Direct Chassislink, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Arnold et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Paula Arnold and Brian Arnold
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Arnold v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
Sharon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Bumpas et al
as 4:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Randal Lee Thompson
Defendant:
Christopher Bumpas and Lance Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Deary et al
as 4:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Randal Lee Thompson
Defendant:
Jermaine Deary and Lance Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Womack et al v. Murray
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shanita Denise Womack and Nikita Goffney, SR
Defendant:
Owen J Murray, David J Baker, Linda K Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miralda-Cruz v. USA
as 3:2022cv01378
Petitioner:
Arnold Steven Miralda-Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
