Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Johnson et al v. Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services et al
as 1:2013cv05082
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Falen, Cassandra Scanlon and Julie Hamos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuevas v. City of Montgomery et al
as 1:2013cv04720
Plaintiff:
Dolores Cuevas
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Officer Mayyou, J. Niete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hampton v. Schwarz et al
as 1:2013cv04672
Plaintiff:
James E Hampton
Defendant:
Dianna Schwarz, Dr. Aguinaldo, Ester Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2013cv02384
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Charity Fields, Forest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. J.V.D.B. & Associates
as 1:2012cv07223
Defendant:
J.V.D.B. & Associates
Plaintiff:
Robert C Johnson
Counter_claimant:
J.V.D.B. & Associates
Counter_defendant:
Robert C Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Generation Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2012cv05577
Plaintiff:
Eartha C. Johnson
Defendant:
Generation Mortgage Company and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv04950
Plaintiff:
Terry C. Johnson
Defendant:
Dorothy Brown and County Of Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Randle, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Michael Randle, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
