Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Rindahl v. Daugaard et al
as 4:2011cv04082
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Dennis Daugaard, Tim Reisch, D. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forsman v. Hyde et al
as 3:2010cv03025
Petitioner:
Connie Fay Forsman
Respondent:
Brenda Hyde, Tim Reisch, Duane Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forsman v. Reisch et al
as 3:2010cv03023
Plaintiff:
Connie F. Forsman
Defendant:
Tim Reisch, Duane Russell, Brenda Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Weber et al
as 1:2010cv01026
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan Larson
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Behrle et al v. Larson et al
as 5:2010cv05038
Plaintiff:
William Behrle and Monica Frank
Defendant:
Jeanette Larson, Gary Larson, Sharon Woodle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Moody County, South Dakota et al
as 4:2009cv04183
Plaintiff:
Steven Carl Larson
Defendant:
Moody County, South Dakota and Minnehaha County, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. Davis et al
as 4:2009cv04142
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Gomez
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Davis, Melissa Larson, Deputy Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl v. Riesch et al
as 4:2009cv04085
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Tim Riesch, Douglas Webber, Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aune et al v. Labor, United States Department of et al
as 5:2009cv05009
Petitioner:
James Aune, Charles Eickoff, Nickolas Jenniges and others
Respondent:
Labor, United States Department of, Labor, United States Department of and United States Air Force
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Larson v. Taylor et al
as 4:2008cv04146
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee Larson
Defendant:
Eugene Taylor, Roger Gerlach and Cheryl Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
