Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Vater et al v. Warren et al
as 2:2020cv00720
Defendant:
Samantha McGuire Flynn, Saks Fifth Avenue, LLC, Saks & Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adriana H. Vater, John S. Vater, A. Vater Inc. and others
Bodner et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2019cv11776
Plaintiff:
Sonia Vega, Sean McShane, Gideon Huttler and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Downes v. McGuire
as 7:2019cv11281
Plaintiff:
Marion Downes
Defendant:
Kevin M. McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 9:2019cv01330
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
State of Florida, Florida Department of Corrections, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WBAI et al v. Pacifica Foundation
as 1:2019cv09387
Petitioner:
James Sagurton, Mimi Rosenberg, Alex Steinberg and others
Respondent:
Pacifica Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pr
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 9:2019cv01220
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
State of Florida, Florida Department of Corrections, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv05653
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, State of Florida, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 6:2019cv06689
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Ashley Moody and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv08598
Defendant:
State of Florida, Mark Inch and Ashley Moody
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
