Cases 41 - 50 of 53
King v. Timmerman-Cooper
as 2:2008cv00317
Petitioner:
Lance King
Respondent:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. Timmerman-Cooper
as 2:2008cv00331
Petitioner:
Billy E. Hunt
Respondent:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Forester v. Doe et al
as 2:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
John W. Forester
Defendant:
John Doe, D Timmerman-Cooper, Curtis Wingard and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Timmerman-Cooper
as 1:2008cv00380
Petitioner:
Henry Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfel et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2007cv01296
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Wolfel and Anthony M. Soto
Defendant:
Terry J. Collins, Dwight Pressler, Deb Timmerman-Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Timmerman-Cooper, Warden et al
as 2:2007cv01227
Plaintiff:
Adrian Edmonds
Defendant:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Warden, Brian Cook, DeCarlo Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfel v. Timmerman-Cooper et al
as 2:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Wolfel
Defendant:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper and Ohio Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barker v. Goodrich et al
as 2:2007cv00946
Plaintiff:
Jasen Barker and Jasen Barker
Defendant:
Andrew Goodrich, Kimberly Adams, Patrick Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. London Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Allen Doe Boyd
Defendant:
London Correctional Institution, Mrs. D. Timmerman-Cooper, Dr. Daniel Fulks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Timmerman-Cooper
as 5:2007cv01915
Petitioner:
Keith W. Bradford
Respondent:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
