Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Velasquez v. Lending Group, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Regan Velasquez
Defendant:
Lending Group, Inc., HSBC Mortgage Services Inc , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Ramirez-Velasquez v. Arpaio
as 2:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Ramirez-Velasquez
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez-Morales v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00941
Petitioner:
Sacramento Velasquez-Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Velasquez-Carreno v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv02202
Petitioner:
Pablo Velasquez-Carreno
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bujanda-Velasquez v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01979
Petitioner:
Jesus Ismael Bujanda-Velasquez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Velasquez-Duran v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01570
Petitioner:
Jorge Velasquez-Duran
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grandinetti v. Bradley et al
as 2:2008cv00191
Plaintiff:
Francis A Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Richard Reyes, Frank Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woods v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamont Woods
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, James Kimble, Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez-Velasquez v. USA
as 4:2007cv00598
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarez-Velasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
