Cases 41 - 50 of 247
King v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Eric King
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dennis Capps v. USDC-CAFR
as 23-70038
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DENNIS RAY CAPPS and CIOLLI, Warden
Petitioner:
DENNIS RAY CAPPS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Gallegos Castrellon v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Arturo Gallegos Castrellon
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, USA and Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv03262
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mohamed v. English et al
as 1:2022cv03213
Plaintiff:
Khalfan Khamis Mohamed
Defendant:
English, (I) English, Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2022cv03119
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosby, Gregory D Cosmo Crosby and Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, AW Programs Complex, CMC Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perry Harrington v. Ciolli
as 22-16616
Petitioner / Appellant:
PERRY HARRINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CIOLLI, Warden
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whetstone v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Roger Whetstone
Respondent:
Kristi Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
