Cases 41 - 50 of 934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Evans v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Delarick Evans
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lampkin v. Cox et al
as 6:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Dannal Cox, R.S. Simmons, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snider v. Shipley et al
as 3:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Snider
Defendant:
Jeremy Shipley, Freestone County and M Brian Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ehrlich v. Evans et al
as 5:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Desiree Ehrlich
Defendant:
Jeffrey O'Neal Evans and Tradition Transportation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Fishinghawk v. Mooneyham
as 6:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Respondent:
FNU Mooneyham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckler v. Austin, III, et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Philip Traugott Buckler
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth and others
Kelso v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Larry G Kelson and Larry G Kelso
Defendant:
3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Michelle Evans
Defendant:
Jose Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
