Cases 41 - 50 of 59
HUBBARD v. PAYNE et al
as 1:2014cv00367
Defendant:
MR. DERCK, MS. DERCK, MR. PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2013cv01789
Defendant:
ALISON KAY LLC and JOSEPH HUBBARD
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Hultgren v. Veracco et al
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Marylou Hultgren
Defendant:
Lawrence Veracco, Al Gandolfi, Patrick Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jacob P Hubbard, A N H, Barbara M Boykins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
GAMBLE v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GAMBLE
Defendant:
BARRY HOLDER, OFC. HUBBARD, MS. PENNINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUBBARD v. UNITED PACKAGE LIQUOR, INC.
as 1:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
DONALD HUBBARD
Defendant:
UNITED PACKAGE LIQUOR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
