Cases 41 - 50 of 319,343
Dorr v. Makwa Global, LLC
as 0:2024cv02456
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Dorr
Defendant:
Makwa Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05491
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Defendant:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Addison v. Armstrong
as 2:2024cv03623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Addison
Defendant:
Julie J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Michenzie v. Heartland Financial USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Mary Michenzie
Defendant:
Heartland Financial USA, Inc., John K. Schmidt, Bruce K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Palmer v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
John J. Palmer
Defendant:
Rosario Adams, Stephanie Ochoa, Erika Garcia-Rdz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Prew v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
John Prew
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saxey v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Bart Saxey
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
