Cases 41 - 50 of 3,800
Theriault v. Agape Baptist Church, Inc., et al
as 6:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
James Theriault
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School and Bryan Clemensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Otte v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Mike Fusselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goswell v. Zalewski et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Melville M Goswell
Defendant:
James Zalewski, Neumann Agriprises, Inc. and McCoy Nationalease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hilt v. Clay County Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Public Defender's Office, Andrew James Ruhlman, Kevin Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. MECC
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
James H. Hamilton
Defendant:
MECC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Stout et al
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
James Stout, K.B.A.S., K.B.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
