Cases 41 - 50 of 118
BECK et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv04314
Plaintiff:
ANDY BECK , AILEEN BECK , HEINZ BUECHI and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-20 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEWIS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv04240
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, DAVID ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BARATOV v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv03775
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MIKHAYLOVICH BARATOV
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, RAND BEERS, JOHN DOE #01 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LEWIS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv03668
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JEFF SESSIONS , DAVID ORTIZ , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KANE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02494
Plaintiff:
ROBIN A KANE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. , PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANE v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv02186
Plaintiff:
STACEY KANE
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & ANALYTICS, LLCA v. KANE
as 2:2016cv08673
Plaintiff:
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & ANALYTICS, LLCA
Defendant:
JOHN KANE
Counter_claimant:
JOHN KANE
Counter_defendant:
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & ANALYTICS, LLCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Healthcare Research & Analytics, LLCA v. Kane
as 1:2016cv08673
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Research & Analytics, LLCA
Defendant:
John Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
