Cases 41 - 50 of 408
HUMANA INC. v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04862
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC., VERSAPHARM, INC., VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
HUMANA INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORP. v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05819
Defendant:
EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SANDOZ, INC., LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
DOLCHIN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04807
Defendant:
MCKEESON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
MORTON DOLCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORTON et al v. GARDNER et al
as 2:2019cv01174
Defendant:
WARREN E GARDNER
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MORTON and JAMES MORTON
Garnishee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Positano v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv01320
Defendant:
Judge Gary Morton, Judge Thomas James, Superior Court of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Onofrio Positano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03650
Plaintiff:
RONNIE O. MORTON
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BENNETT v. PITTS et al
as 2:2019cv02988
Defendant:
JUDGE, JAMES PITTS, LEVI MORTON and others
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
MORTON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv03127
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00629
Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., PLIVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
