Cases 41 - 50 of 264
Pulley v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Aaron Jershon Pulley
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pulley v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Aaron Jershon Pulley
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mongeau v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Steven Mongeau
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe and Well Path Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Richards v. Kelly S. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody S. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomo v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Crisanto Palomo
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Miller
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe and Charle Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Barrera et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
FNU Barrera, Lubbock County Detention Center, Law Library Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Chekota Parker, Bill De Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dressen et al v Flaherty et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ernest Ramirez, Brianne Dressen, Shaun Barcavage and others
Defendant:
Rob Flaherty, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
