Cases 41 - 50 of 1,167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Villalobos et al v. D2C, LLC
as 5:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Dinorath Villalobos and Ezequiel Palomino
Defendant:
D2C, LLC doing business as Univision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
April Herrera v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
April Herrera
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, County of Los Angeles and Adam Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
