Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Bush et al v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bush, Jr
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Mark Sevier, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handzlik v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Handzlik
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Aramark Food Services, Mark Sevier and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGER v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
as 1:2010cv01734
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, C/O TOMPSON and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID SINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2010cv00162
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv00756
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and EDWIN BUSS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS and UN-NAMED PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAIN et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAIN and JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILSON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE et al
as 2:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY WILSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE and MEDICAL STAFF, WVCF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
