Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Bond v. Kendall et al
as 8:2022cv01509
Petitioner:
Cody D. Bond
Respondent:
Frank Kendall, III, Lloyd J. Austin, III and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Price v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Shawn Debree Price
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Zowie Barnes, Abimbola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Lloyd J. Austin, III and Christine Elizabeth Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Austin v. Boher, Warden
as 1:2022cv00461
Petitioner:
Ronald Durelle Austin
Respondent:
William S. Boher, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Austin v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kevin Austin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moss v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv03256
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Moss
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Lt, Murphy, Sgt. Lovelist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Mahammend v. Sergeant Neal et al
as 1:2021cv03114
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
Sergeant Neal, Sergeant Morgan, Sergeant Emin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
