Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Wetzel v. August et al
as 5:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
August, Unknown Officer and Richard A Swartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Leblalc et al
as 5:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
James Leblalc, Warden of David Wade Correctional Center, Ralph L Morrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Barber et al
as 5:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Michael Barber, Nail, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Prince et al
as 5:2012cv03097
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Howard Prince, Unknown Preacher and Unknown E M T
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv02882
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Harrell and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swank v. Tanner et al
as 2:2011cv03122
Plaintiff:
Johnny Swank
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Leroy Perkins and Andrew D. Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2011cv01194
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00988
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Howard Prince, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
