Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00126
Defendant:
Walgreens Mail Service, LLC, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walgreens.com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Attorney General Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Andy Beshear
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartlett v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Drashawn Bartlett
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Ranae Barbes, Jeff Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Healey et al
as 3:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Sanderson
Defendant:
Steven Healey, Mike Anderson, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinzan v. Bevin et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Clara Jo Elaine Reinzan
Defendant:
Matt Bevin , Andy Beshear , Vickie Yates Brown Glisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Litteral et al
as 6:2017cv00197
Petitioner:
Roger Dean Hall
Respondent:
Kathy Litteral, Andy Beshear and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torian v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Frank Torian, Jr.
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Attorney General Andy Beshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jason Brooks
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Andy Beshear and Kentucky Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Overly et al
as 3:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey M. Young
Defendant:
Sannie Overly, Clint Morris, Andy Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Ording v. Davis et al
as 0:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ording
Defendant:
Kim Davis, Matt Bevin and Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
