Cases 41 - 50 of 650
Curry v. Reardon
as 9:2022cv00878
Petitioner:
John Curry
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci and Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowell et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv06538
Plaintiff:
Male Randy Sowell and Desire Diamond Samuels Sowell
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS Anthony J. Annucci, NYDC Commissioner Cynthia Brann, Phil Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weis v. Annucci
as 9:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Robert Weis
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Annucci
as 2:2022cv04372
Petitioner:
Rene Hernandez
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Dean v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
William M. Dean
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Patrick D. Reardon, D. Debejian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felder v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00744
Plaintiff:
David Felder
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, K. Snyder, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, John Doe, "John Doe" Kerpieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv05801
Petitioner:
Darrin McGhee
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci and Sharlisa Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv04887
Petitioner:
Lature Irvin, Sr.
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Dontie S. Mitchell
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
