Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Bayhaven Enterprises, LLC et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv10017
Plaintiff:
Bayhaven Enterprises, LLC , Mark Adams , Matthew Aden and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fifth Third Bank v. Double Tree Lake Estates LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Double Tree Lake Estates LLC , Doubletree Golf LLC , DBL Residential LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lundberg et al v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Edward Lundberg , Terry E Troutman , Anthony Meyer and others
Defendant:
Global Fitness Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Anthony Meyer
as 11-1430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY MEYERS
United States of America v. Meyers
as 1:2011cv01090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McArthur Diary, LLC v. Mccowtree Brothers Dairy, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv62033
Plaintiff:
McArthur Diary, LLC and McArthur Diary, LLC
Defendant:
Mccowtree Brothers Dairy, Inc., Mccowtree Brothers Dairy, Inc., Anthony Meyers and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Dean Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Meyer et al v. Meyer et al
as 1:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyer and Joseph Meyer
Defendant:
Donald Meyer and Linda Meyer
Cause Of Action: Diversity
IN RE The Interest of WNM, et al v. Meyer et al
as 3:2008cv05451
Defendant:
Neil Anthony Meyer and Nicole Marie Potebnya
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meyers v. Navajo Express/Digby Refrigerated Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00933
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyers
Defendant:
Navajo Express/Digby Refrigerated Inc., Digby-Ringsby Trucklines, Inc., Don Digby, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
