Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 158
NALEWAK v. ARAMARK et al
as 5:2018cv00145
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. NALEWAK
Defendant: ARAMARK , ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC , ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02399
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv05032
Plaintiff: DANIEL RUSSELL ANDREWS, SR.
Defendant: ARAMARK CORP., PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and CORIZON MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOP412, LLC v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff: SHOP412, LLC
Defendant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_claimant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_defendant: SHOP412, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff: GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant: PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03437
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00919
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
LEWIS-BEY v. PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv02890
Plaintiff: TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant: PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS, BLANCHE CARNEY, TERRANCE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02829
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?