Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Salley v. Apker et al
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Salley
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Theresa M Talplacido, Louis W Winn, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Ash Management Company LLC et al v. Travelers Companies Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Paul Ash Management Company LLC
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Villareal v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2017cv02825
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Lori Ash
Plaintiff:
Adrian L Villareal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Shartle et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Errick Eugene Gilmore
Defendant:
Unknown Mishel, Unknown Shied, Unknown Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ash et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
David Ray Ash and Eva Ash
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service et al
as 4:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service , William Clay , David Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Conrad v. Ash et al
as 4:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
David Conrad
Defendant:
A Ash, Unknown Shartel and Unknown Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. England et al
as 4:2016cv00465
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
S England, JT Shartle, AW Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. England et al
as 4:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Unknown England, Unknown Michaels, JT Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safari Club International v. Jewell, et al.
as 4:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Safari Club International
Defendant:
Sally Jewell , United States Department of Interior , Daniel M Ashe and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
