Cases 41 - 50 of 600
Salilign v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tesfaye Mulugeta Salilign
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dedes v. Paige et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christos D. Dedes
Defendant:
Rosewell Paige, John H. O'Brion, Jr., James Watson Morris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mitchell v. The Attorney Generals
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
The Attorney Generals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arnous v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Manar Arnous
Defendant:
Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland, UR M. Jaddou, Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
