Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Walsh v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv04469
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Braxton C. Cotton, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFUS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 3:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merilien v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
as 1:2018cv03241
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roller v. Mills et al
as 1:2018cv03242
Respondent:
Braxton Cotton, Jacqueline Bunn, Terry Barnard and others
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Roller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Lawson et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Alton W. Brown
Defendant:
Michael Lawson, John Roberts, Debra Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Segral Seville Watkins
Defendant:
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James W. Mills, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker, Jr v. Harris County District Attorney et al
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Baker, Jr
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney, Talbot County Superior Court, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
IMARE' FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JIMMY AUTRY STATE PRISON, WALTER BERRY, BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
