Cases 41 - 50 of 73
MARTINEZ v. SALAMON et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Petitioner:
LOUIS MARTINEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shears v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
John Wetzel, J. Rivello, D. Sampsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Salamon et al
as 1:2021cv01103
Petitioner:
Willie Dickson
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Bobbi Jo Salamon and York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRENCH v. SALAMON
as 3:2021cv00097
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES FRENCH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (JOSH SHAPIRO) and SUPERINTENDENT BOBBI JO SALAMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettis v. Salamon et al
as 3:2021cv00827
Petitioner:
Alex M. Pettis
Respondent:
Bobby Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and District Attorney Dauphin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight, II v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2021cv00757
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Lycoming County Prosescutor's Office, Josh Shapiro and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence H. Knight, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 21-1783
Respondent:
J. JONES, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. CLOSE and others
Petitioner:
In re: LAVOND HILL
CLAYTON v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2021cv01732
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
SIDNEY W. CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI HOUTZDALE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HENRY v. CLINE et al
as 3:2020cv00206
Defendant:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MS. K. KERI MOORE, MS. D. VARVER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
