Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Shirey v. Giles, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake Shirey
Defendant:
Sandra Giles and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Pedehel P. Martin, Benton Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Andre Dansby
Defendant:
Captain Babers , Lt. Lockley , Timothy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Rene Mason, B. Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Dyron Smith
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers , Kenneth Sconyers , Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petite v. Hetzel (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Isadore Petite
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson, Gwendolyn Babers, S. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldridge v. Rogers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Aldridge
Defendant:
Capt. Baber , Mr. Rogers , Mrs. Liptrot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Body v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Andre Body
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Warden Sconyers, Capt. Baber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
