Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Whyde v. Sigsworth et al
as 3:2019cv00683
Defendant:
Amber Burgess, Jason A. Beatty, Erie County Health Department and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Whyde, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Passmore v. Barrett et al
as 1:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz and Judge Michael R. Barrett
Plaintiff:
Lamar Passmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01731
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bostic v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2018cv00971
Defendant:
Richard A. Mains, Joseph M. Deters, Angela C. Byers and others
Plaintiff:
Teddy Glen Bostic, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 2:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrow
Defendant:
Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 2:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
William J. Barrett
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017op45094
Plaintiff:
Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell Realty Company v. Barrett et al
as 1:2017cv00878
Plaintiff:
Russell Realty Company
Defendant:
William J. Barrett and Russell Real Estate Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cassell et al v. Licking County Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Cassell, III, Randi Wagner and Angela Barrett
Defendant:
Licking County Memorial Hospital, Hooper, Ranic Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
