Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Rayburn v. Landrum et al
as 2:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gary Rayburn
Defendant:
Billy Joe Landrum and Bart Gavin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbin v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
David Lee Harbin
Defendant:
Emitt Sparkman, Christopher Epps, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Patrick Thomas, Major D Wilkerson, Warden of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Jones County et al
as 2:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hudson
Defendant:
Jones County , Jones County Board Of Supervisors , Wendell Bart Gavin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Cotton et al
as 4:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Cotton, Bart Grimes, Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hendricks
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Nakia Reshea Sutton
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey, Sandra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Thomas et al
as 4:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Clara Thomas, Ashley Nelson, S. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Wendell Duncan
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Marion Bart Grimes, Willie Bookert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Zulu v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Shakaa Daniel Muhammad Al-Zulu
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility, GEO Group, Inc., Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
