Cases 41 - 50 of 74
LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS BENEFIT FUNDS v. BRIGHT MAINTENANCE
as 2:2017cv05449
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS BENEFIT FUNDS
Defendant:
BRIGHT MAINTENANCE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BRIGHT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 1:2016cv07057
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRIGHT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGHT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05858
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BRIGHT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAHN v. BURLINGTON CITY et al
as 1:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
STEVEN S KAHN
Defendant:
BURLINGTON CITY , BURLINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , ANTHONY WALACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEINE et al v. DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS et al
as 2:2015cv08210
Plaintiff:
ELLEN HEINE, CHRISTOPHER GRIECO, KARA GRIECO and others
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS, BUREAU CHIEF, DIVISION OF FIRE AND SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGHT v. TYSON et al
as 2:2015cv08038
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NATHANIEL BRIGHT
Defendant:
C. TYSON, G. CORDOVA, E. MERCADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEA BRIGHT FIRST AID SQUAD, INC. v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2015cv06020
Plaintiff:
SEA BRIGHT FIRST AID SQUAD, INC.
Defendant:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
SEA BRIGHT FIRST AID SQUAD, INC. v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv06020
Plaintiff:
SEA BRIGHT FIRST AID SQUAD, INC.
Defendant:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
FUSCHETTO v. FOSTER et al
as 3:2015cv05485
Plaintiff:
DONNA LYNN FUSCHETTO
Defendant:
JOSEPH L. FOSTER, OREN THOMAS, JMC, JENNIFER VELEZ, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
