Cases 41 - 50 of 286
Thai v. Burns et al
as 4:2021cv01267
Defendant:
Keith A Feldman, John Vo, Dale G Spencer and others
Plaintiff:
An Thai
Patterson v. Lordstown Motors Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv00910
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, David T. Hamamoto, Julio C. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Patterson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kelley et al v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00724
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Stotler and Alicia Kelley
In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00604
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cohen, David M. Cohen, Herbert Stotler and others
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zuod v. Lordstown Motors Corp. et al
as 4:2021cv00720
Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp., Julio C. Rodriguez, Stephen S. Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Sulayman Zuod
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv21098
Plaintiff:
Maria C Rodriguez
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jamil Bey v. Camden County Superior Court, et al
as 21-1013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIL AMIN BEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and HON. YOLANDA C. RODRIGUEZ
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14650
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK C. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
