Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Arthur et al v. Willamette Community Health Solutions et al
as 6:2017cv00885
Defendant:
Richard Abraham, Russ Boring, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Arthur, Donna Christian and Jeffery Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedersen v. Popoff
as 6:2017cv00145
Petitioner:
Kory Christian Pedersen
Respondent:
Christine Popoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks et al v. Berge et al
as 3:2016cv02129
Plaintiff:
Claudius Banks, Danielle Banks and Daynelle Banks
Defendant:
Officer Christian Berge and City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Witt v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv01735
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Christian Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Durr v. USA
as 3:2016cv01124
Petitioner:
Christian Michael Durr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
M. Christian Bottoms
as 3:2016ad00008
In Re:
M. Christian Bottoms
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
