Cases 41 - 50 of 681
McIntyre v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv40095
Plaintiff:
Sheryle Katherine McIntyre
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hagan v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03929
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi, Darlene Hagan and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Turner Costa v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv05812
Plaintiff:
Diane Turner Costa
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stone v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv03823
Plaintiff:
Melva Stone
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sarlo v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11645
Plaintiff:
Dawn Sarlo
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv30075
Plaintiff:
Eudith Perez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HATFIELD v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01276
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HATFIELD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Casarez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023at00595
Plaintiff:
Amanda Suzanne Casarez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jabin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11558
Plaintiff:
Sufra Amreen Jabin
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Newman Larkin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11542
Plaintiff:
Crystal Newman Larkin
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
