Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Johnson v. Conner et al
as 2:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Johnson
Defendant:
Ryan Conner, Sonya Mayo and Barbour County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dorisa Conner , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Conner v. Bessemer, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01945
Plaintiff:
Marlin Conner
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of, Bessemer PD, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Bessemer, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2011cv01813
Plaintiff:
Marlin Conner
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of, Alabama and Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. City of Bessemer et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00357
Plaintiff:
Marlin Conner
Defendant:
City of Bessemer, Bessemer P.D., Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northington et al v. Southern Cal Transport, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
Pamela Northington , Lamont Bracy , Tony Conner and others
Defendant:
Southern Cal Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Conner v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2010cv03171
Plaintiff:
Deric Brian Conner
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Andrew Jairam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. The City of Dothan et al
as 1:2010cv00985
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Defendant:
The City of Dothan, John R. Powell, Michael Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2010cv01895
Plaintiff:
Anita Brown , Joyce Webb , Timothy Byers and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Astrazeneca LP and Zeneca, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
