Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Boyd et al v. SFS Communications, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv03068
Plaintiff:
James Herbert Boyd, Jr. , John Christopher Poles , Steven Mitchell Borden and others
Defendant:
SFS Communications, LLC, Ferdous Ahmed Sharif, CU Employment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Orlova et al v. B-K-J Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01593
Defendant:
B-K-J Company, Inc. and Anthony Scott Braglio
Plaintiff:
Anna Orlova and Courtney Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prince v. USA - 2255
as 8:2013cv01401
Petitioner:
Courtney Leon Prince
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watson v. Robinson
as 1:2013cv01288
Plaintiff:
Brianna M. Watson
Defendant:
Courtney Collins Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Morales-Courtney v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02828
Plaintiff:
Deborah Morales-Courtney
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Madison et al v. Harford County, Maryland et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Madison , Moses P. Madison , Annie Madison and others
Defendant:
Harford County, Maryland , Jesse Bane , Flemmens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiCave et al v. Robinson
as 1:2011cv02762
Plaintiff:
Anthony DiCave and Angela Marie DiCave
Defendant:
Courtney Collins Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
