Cases 41 - 50 of 156
Park State Bank v. Duluth Steel Fabricators, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02438
Defendant:
Gleason Construction, Inc., Mark W. Youngren, Bougalis Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Park State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Edner v. Redwood County District Attorney's Office et al
as 0:2019cv02486
Defendant:
Attorney Megan Burkehammer, Redwood Count - State of Minnesota Board of Public Defenders, Joel Solie and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Edner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. City of Rochester, et al
as 0:2019cv01846
Plaintiff:
James Campbell and Sarah Louisell
Defendant:
Rochester Economic Development Authority and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Edner v. Redwood County District Attorney's Office et al
as 0:2019cv02485
Defendant:
Attorney Megan Burkehammer, Joel Solie, Mike Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Edner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimm et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02246
Plaintiff:
Justin Spaunhorst, Daniel Flanagan, Matthew Cowell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02220
Plaintiff:
Christopher Raney, Michael Whiddon, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Bryant et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02188
Plaintiff:
Brian Burtsfield, Bradley Wade Caraviello, Keith Collins and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Does 1-50 and others
Hoskins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02145
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sonnier, Aaron Mosdal, Christopher Lawrence and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
