Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Moore v. O.D.O.C.'s Behavioral Health Services et al
as 3:2011cv00320
Defendant:
Dr. Dugan, Phil Engleman, Dr. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2008cv01398
Plaintiff:
Carla R Dodd
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Armenta-Cardoso v. City of Gresham et al
as 3:2008cv01272
Plaintiff:
Marco Armenta-Cardoso
Defendant:
City of Gresham, City of Gresham Police Department, Carla C. Piluso and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spinks v. Lewandowski et al
as 6:2008cv06266
Plaintiff:
James I. Spinks
Defendant:
Chealsea S. Lewandowski, Ford Motor Credit, Hooper, Englund & Weil, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jerardo Rodriguez
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Ms. Howton, Carla Tupou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padgett v. Kowanda et al
as 3:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Defendant:
Anton Kowanda, Chris Schaefer, Scott Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larsen v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv01481
Plaintiff:
Carla Larsen
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaza v. City of Gresham et al
as 3:2007cv01442
Plaintiff:
Erik Plaza and Erik Plaza
Defendant:
City of Gresham, City of Gresham, Carla Piluso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pederson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv01429
Plaintiff:
Carla Pederson
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
