Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00934
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ALEXANDER et al v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR. and others
Defendant: THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, DAVID WRAY, RANDALL BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benham et al v. City of Charlotte et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00395
Plaintiff: Philip Benham , Sheryl Chandler and Operation Save America, Inc.
Defendant: City of Charlotte, NC , Emily Westbrook and Keith Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FSC Securities Corporation v. Chandler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00304
Plaintiff: FSC Securities Corporation and FSC Securities Corporation
Defendant: James M. Chandler, Richard D. Hopper, Shirley P. Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation v. Dat-A-Syst, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00160
Plaintiff: Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation and Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation
Defendant: Dat-A-Syst, Inc. and Bruce Chandler
Counter Claimant: Dat-A-Syst, Inc. and Bruce Chandler
Counter Defendant: Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation, Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation and Liquid Capital Exchange Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?