Cases 41 - 50 of 145
BOOKER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Defendant:
OFFICER BALLARD, JULIE BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BOOKER v. LASHBROOK et al
as 2:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Defendant:
OFFICER S. LASHBROOK, CHARLES LOCKETT and NURSE S. MILLER-BASINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HALLOCK v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00206
Petitioner:
DONALD HAFF HALLOCK
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Hooper et al
as 4:2012cv01668
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
K. Hooper, Charles Lockett, Complex Warden at Terra Haute USP Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Defendant:
J. BIEGHLEY, JASTILLANO, KUPSKA and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG N. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BOOKER v. ISEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, ISEMAN, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BLANCHARD v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00149
Petitioner:
RAY BLANCHARD
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENEMORE v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
LAWERNCE D KENEMORE, JR
Warden:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARTELHO v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00139
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BARTELHO
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
