Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Scott v. Atkinson
as 9:2013cv02936
Petitioner:
Charlie Scott
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leaphart v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2013cv01564
Plaintiff:
Kareem Leaphart
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, Scott Lewis, James Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tolen v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2013cv01565
Plaintiff:
Frank Tolen
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, Scott Lewis, James Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Collins v. Padula et al
as 2:2012cv03112
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
Anthony Padula, Michael McCall, Keith McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCants v. Dennis et al
as 1:2012cv02721
Petitioner:
Charlie McCants, Jr
Respondent:
Anthony Dennis, Sumter, County of, Assigned Judges of General Sessions Court of Sumter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Nelson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv02066
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Nelson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Wilson Simmon and Charlie Turbine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bells v. USA
as 3:2012cv01348
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charlie Bells, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bradley v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Charlie Bradley
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Perales v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Vulcan Inc, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gault v. Wright et al
as 7:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gault
Defendant:
Chuck Wright and Charlie Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
