Cases 41 - 50 of 4,103
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The State of Texas v. Graham
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
Christopher Lauren Graham
Molina v. Arias et al
as 7:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
David A. Arias, Sergio Martinez, Sgt. Alyssa D. Gurra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Martin
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linh N. Bass and Monglinh Ngo Bass
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Jason Schmoker, Kenneth Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isidienu v. UST General Contracting LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Andrew Isidienu
Defendant:
UST General Contracting LLC, Christopher Roach, Lisa Wagley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williamson v. Jay Hileman et al
as 4:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williamson
Defendant:
Jay Hileman, Ryan McConnell and Christopher Petrowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Najera v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Najera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
