Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Tardif v. Martin
as 1:2021cv02439
Plaintiff:
Eric Tardif
Defendant:
Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
South Mill Mushroom, LLC v. V.I.P. Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07200
Plaintiff:
South Mill Mushroom, LLC
Defendant:
V.I.P. Marketing, Inc., Christopher Martin, Jesse Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILLIAMS v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2021cv11759
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN and CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
LINDA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zixuan Rao, et al v. Apple Inc.
as 21-80020
Respondent:
REMY TURNER, JOEY BARUCH, KEVIN MELKOWSKI and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marc Adams, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 20-56290
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JENKINS, TUAN BUI, WALTER GOETZMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC ADAMS, ROBERT C. MURPHY, MIKE PETERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Ballout v. Small Business Administration of the United States et al
as 4:2020cv12962
Defendant:
Anshul Munjal, Christopher Martin, Dawn Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ballout individually and as Chariman Enerkon Solar International Doing business as Enerkon Solar International
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of William D. Pilgrim, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 20-56073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN FERRER, MARC ADAMS, DEVRY DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
