Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3284
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01934
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ferguson v. Civil City of South Bend IN et al
as 3:2013cv00417
Plaintiff: Jonathan Ferguson
Defendant: Civil City of South Bend IN , Pete Buttigieg , Charles Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Franklin et al v. Civil City of South Bend et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00207
Plaintiff: Dan Franklin , Vivian Franklin and Deshawn Franklin
Defendant: Civil City of South Bend , Pete Buttigieg , Charles Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kristy Dean, et al v. City of South Bend, et al
as 12-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant: KRISTY DEAN and WERNER O'CONNELL
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SOUTH BEND, SOUTH BEND POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHUA MORGAN, Officer and others
Roy Wirtz, et al v. City of South Bend We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3811
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROY WIRTZ, ERIC BROWN, PETER REIMERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Indiana
ARG Corporation v. City of South Bend, et al
as 11-3028
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ARG CORPORATION and NORBERT R. TOUBES, as distributee of ARG Corporation's assets
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SOUTH BEND, acting through the SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
In Re: MTBE Products Liability
as 10-4329
Plaintiff: Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: The City of New York, City of NY, The Water Board and others
Consolidated-Defendant: Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant: Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-500
Cross-Claimant: Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
In Re: MTBE Products Liability We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4135
Plaintiff: Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: The City of New York and City of NY
Consolidated-Defendant: Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant: Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-500
Defendant-Third-Party - Appellant: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cross-Claimant: Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?