Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Stephens v. Midfirst Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Danielle Stephens
Defendant:
Midfirst Bank doing business as Midland Mortgage and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Paris v. Carrocia et al
as 4:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Paris
Defendant:
Ronni Carrocia, Daylan Root, Ty Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hooper v. The City of Tulsa
as 22-5034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN HOOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Brooks v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Easker James Brooks, III
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Cherish Comfort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sayles v. City of Tulsa
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Sayles and Lawrence Sayles
Defendant:
City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Knight v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knight
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, John Scully, Brent Sugg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Delaney v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
Michael Delaney
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Aaron Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
