Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Diaz et al v. Devlin et al
as 4:2016cv40039
Plaintiff:
Marianne Diaz , N.M. , B.A. and others
Defendant:
James P. Devlin , Nicholas E. Nason , Jeffrey Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Roberge et al
as 4:2016cv40020
Plaintiff:
Chad Jackson
Defendant:
Peter Roberge , John Bossolt , Thomas Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv40148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega-Santiago v. Ryder et al
as 4:2015cv40097
Plaintiff:
Edwin Vega-Santiago
Defendant:
Michael Ryder , James Guittar , Gary J. Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz, Jr. v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40076
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Gary J. Gemme, Jeffrey P Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Adalberto Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ortiz v. Roche et al
as 4:2015cv40037
Plaintiff:
Jose L Ortiz
Defendant:
Steve Roche, Michael A. Tarckini, Gary J. Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mangual v. Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40017
Plaintiff:
Hector L Mangual
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Gary J Gemme , Matthew Early and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Properties, LLC et al v. Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40009
Plaintiff:
College Hill Properties, LLC , Caro Street Properties, LLC , Clay Street Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Department of Building and Zoning , Department of Health and Housing Inspections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Bisceglia et al
as 4:2014cv40179
Plaintiff:
Gaynell Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Bisceglia , John Doe, Gary Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. City of Worcester, et al
as 1:2014cv14298
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Defendant:
City of Worcester and Michael Spalatro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
