Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Commerce Insurance Company as Subrogee of Jacqueline Perrin
as 1:2010cv10993
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Company as Subrogee of Jacqueline Perrin
Defendant:
Hamilton Beach, Inc. and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Commerce Insurance Company as Subrogee of Jacqueline Perrin v. Hamilton Beach, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv10993
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hamilton Beach, Inc. and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Commerce Insurance Company v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Certificate No. LGL046316
as 4:2009cv40077
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Certificate No. LGL046316
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Federal Insurance Company v. Commerce Insurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv30079
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Commerce Insurance Company, Estate of Lucia A. Roberts and Kitty Howard
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Commerce Insurance Company v. GSC Technology, Corp. et al
as 4:2007cv40195
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
GSC Technology, Corp. and GSC Forwarding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Commerce Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products Inc et al
as 1:2007cv11013
Plaintiff:
Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products Inc and Emerson Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Farahani et al v. Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv10251
Plaintiff:
Ghodrat Farahani, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Ghodrat Farahani
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts, Bristol County Superior Court for the States of Massachusetts, Appeals Court for the State of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
