Cases 41 - 50 of 460
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB v. THONET et al
as 2:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB doing business as CHRISTIANA TRUST NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M THONET, DIEUWERTJE W THONET and CONCORDE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Interested Party:
DAMARSICOTTA MONTESSORI SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COVETRUS INC et al v. ACTIAN CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
VETERINARY DATA SERVICES INC and COVETRUS INC
Defendant:
ACTIAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. ELLIS
as 2:2021cv00129
Defendant:
SUSAN WEAVER ELLIS
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. RINGROSE
as 2:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
LAURENCE D RINGROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. WHITING
as 2:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
PAUL L WHITING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARENCE SPURLING v. WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00053
Defendant:
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE SPURLING ESQ doing business as SPURLING LAW OFFICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. SMALT
as 1:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
LARRY J SMALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. GALLAGHER
as 1:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
CODY L GALLAGHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
