Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
EDMONDS v. CRISP REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv00186
Plaintiff: JAMES W EDMONDS
Defendant: CRISP REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES and STEVE GAUTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crisp v. Cole
as 1:2012cv02939
Plaintiff: Nathan Crisp
Defendant: Brenda Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BENTLEY v. Crisp County Detention Center et al
as 1:2011cv00168
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JEROME BENTLEY
Defendant: CRISP COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CRISP COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, Donnie Haroldson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTLEY v. Cordele Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JEROME BENTLEY
Defendant: CORDELE GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Crisp County Detention Center, Gail Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff: Sherman Dickey
Defendant: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff: Sherman Dickey
Defendant: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooten v. Fachini et al
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff: Mark T Hooten
Defendant: Denise D. Fachini, Gail Sims, Tamara Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00175
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Smith v. Crisp County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00409
Petitioner: Alverriss Smith
Respondent: Crisp County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?